FraudJournal Blog

March 12, 2013

Should Forensic Accountants Be Considered Private Investigators?

I must say it is nice to see Forensic Accountants become acknowledged by the general public as a potential solution to detecting, defending and even more importantly deferring, as much as possible, fraudulent behavior in the workplace and home. Even shows such as NCIS have given a nod, however slightly, to Forensic Accountants (often noted as FA). Most Certified Fraud Examiners (CFE) have some working knowledge of accounting and this has become more emphasized in our annual training. And many private investigators have to review financial information in order to follow through with their engagements with clients. Which brings me to my question for the general fraud community, should Forensic Accountants become Private Investigators and licensed within their state as is required by some states.

While most states have specific regulations that professionals who “investigate” as a profession must be registered and licensed as private investigators, FAs and CFEs for the most part have not been included in this group. Recently, private investigators have raised their voices to urge any and all individuals that claim to or state they investigate be required to follow state law and become licensed as a private investigator.

I agree that investigative work requires knowledge of state laws and regulations to keep both investigator and the general public safe from unqualified professionals looking to merely increase revenue and try out new trends of services. CFEs are required by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) to maintain training and must pass a 4-part exam and submit recommendations prior to being allowed to take the exam. This includes: Investigation, Financial Transactions, Criminology, Law.

Having said this, many CPAs have become FAs in order to build a more diversified portfolio of services such as fraud prevention, fraud risk consultations and forensic accounting. I do have concerns with CPAs who provide forensic accounting services that are not CFEs. Not because they are educationally lacking in work financial knowledge or work experience, but there are legal ramifications to consider when performing investigative accounting. The rights of both sides of the case, claimant and defendant, have legal rights of process and must be acknowledged according to the rules and regulations of the law.

And so I ask, “Should Forensic Accountants and Certified Fraud Examiners be considered Private Investigators”, and if so, “Should Private Investigators be required to be certified in bookkeeping or accounting 101 before handling financial case work”? There is the opportunity to collaborate in wonderful ways, but do we think this will be the end result or is this a turf war? The question has some merit. What do you think?

 

Advertisements

27 Comments »

  1. […] While most states have specific regulations that professionals who “investigate” as a profession must be registered and licensed as private investigators, FAs and CFEs for the most part have not been included in this group. Recently, private investigators have raised their voices to urge any and all individuals that claim to or state they investigate be required to follow state law and become licensed as a private investigator.  […]

    Pingback by Should Forensic Accountants Be Considered Private Investigators ... | Forensic Auditing | Scoop.it — March 17, 2013 @ 7:54 PM | Reply

  2. My brother suggested I might like this blog. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You can not imagine just how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

    Comment by kwiaciarnia online — March 29, 2013 @ 9:40 AM | Reply

  3. Excellent web site. Lots of helpful info here. I am sending it to several buddies ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks to your sweat!

    Comment by uprawnienia budowlane radom — March 29, 2013 @ 11:53 AM | Reply

    • Thank you for your kind words and sharing the information.

      Comment by fraudjournal — April 1, 2013 @ 4:22 PM | Reply

  4. F*ckin’ remarkable things here. I am very glad to see your post. Thanks a lot and i am looking forward to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

    Comment by wykrywacze metalu — March 30, 2013 @ 7:26 AM | Reply

    • Thank you for reviewing my discussion on PI’s and FA’s. It is an interesting topic and worthy of attention.

      Comment by fraudjournal — April 1, 2013 @ 4:27 PM | Reply

  5. Hello, i believe that i noticed you visited my web site so i got here to “go back the desire”.I am attempting to in finding things to improve my web site!I suppose its adequate to make use of a few of your ideas!!

    Comment by wynajem samochodów kraków — April 1, 2013 @ 10:37 AM | Reply

  6. I just couldn’t depart your website prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard information a person provide for your visitors? Is gonna be back often to check up on new posts

    Comment by adwokat pszczyna — April 1, 2013 @ 10:47 AM | Reply

  7. I used to be very happy to find this internet-site.I wished to thanks to your time for this glorious read!! I definitely having fun with each little little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you blog post.

    Comment by torty komunijne katowice — April 2, 2013 @ 4:41 PM | Reply

  8. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back often!

    Comment by wirtualne biura — April 2, 2013 @ 5:57 PM | Reply

  9. absolutely like your net-site but you have to test the spelling on several of your posts. A variety of them are rife with spelling troubles And that I find it extremely bothersome to reveal to the fact nevertheless I will surely come back again again.

    Comment by Shery Hagstrom — April 7, 2013 @ 7:21 PM | Reply

    • Thank you Shery. All article posts are spell checked and reviewed as thorough as possible. Having said that, I will review and recheck again. Thanks for the insight!
      Carol Bacon, CFE

      Comment by fraudjournal — April 8, 2013 @ 11:35 AM | Reply

  10. Hello.This article was particularly intriguing, specifically because I used to be looking for thoughts on this theme survive Sunday.

    Comment by Karla Mordaunt — April 7, 2013 @ 10:09 PM | Reply

    • Hello Karla. I am not sure what you meant on the last few words of your post, but I am glad you found this article interesting.
      All the best,
      Carol

      Comment by fraudjournal — April 8, 2013 @ 11:39 AM | Reply

  11. Fairly good submit. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that We have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. Following all I’ll be subscribing with your feed and I hope you create once more quickly!

    Comment by Malena Schoenwetter — April 8, 2013 @ 3:59 AM | Reply

  12. This can be the fitting weblog for anybody who wishes to research out out about this topic. You discover a lot its essentially laborious to argue with you (not that I definitely would want…HaHa). You undoubtedly put a fresh spin on a subject thats been created about for many years. Great things, basically nice!

    Comment by Nikole Keenom — April 8, 2013 @ 7:04 AM | Reply

  13. very great post, i certainly love this internet web site, carry on it

    Comment by Lorene Gira — April 8, 2013 @ 10:16 AM | Reply

    • Thanks for the kind words Lorene! I will continue as requested.

      Comment by fraudjournal — April 8, 2013 @ 11:38 AM | Reply

  14. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I don’t know who you might be but definitely you’re heading to a renowned blogger in the event you are usually not definitely 😉 Cheers!

    Comment by Ceola Arrington — April 8, 2013 @ 7:23 PM | Reply

  15. Preserve functioning ,great job!

    Comment by Jordan Kennelty — April 10, 2013 @ 3:59 AM | Reply

    • Thank you Jordan. I plan to share what the outcome of how this heated discussion plays out. Look for possible changes in the rules and methods of forensic accounting. I predict a pairing up of PI’s to FA’s in the future.

      All the best,
      Carol Bacon, CFE

      Comment by fraudjournal — April 10, 2013 @ 11:46 AM | Reply

  16. Great information shared. I truly agree that a Private Investigator should have complete knowledge of state laws and regulations for proper investigations.

    Comment by flingbusters — July 22, 2013 @ 2:20 AM | Reply

  17. Good post reference private investigators enjoyed reading this.

    Comment by Alpha 1 Legal — August 29, 2013 @ 7:18 AM | Reply

  18. This is really a good blog regarding PI. Thanks for sharing it.

    Comment by Private Investigator — March 21, 2014 @ 3:46 AM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: